Clade | |
Subclade |
Taxon | |
Taxon |
Bothrosauropodoidea
|
Nominal Author | Janensch 1929 |
2nd Nominal Author | Kuhn 1961 |
Taxon Status | INACTIVE |
Comments | |
Potential Synonomy |
Active Phylogenetic Definition | |
Active Definition | |
Shorthand | |
Definitional Author | |
Definition Status | Unknown |
Definition Type | Unknown |
Node-Stem Triplet | Unknown |
Other Triplet Taxa | |
Specifiers | |
Specifier(s) A | |
Specifier(s) B | |
Specifier(s) C | |
Qualifiers | |
+Taxon | |
-Taxon | |
Datum | |
Taxonomic Content | |
Publication Year |
Unknown Unknown Unknown |
Inactive Taxon Status | |
Rejection Criteria |
no definition other |
Critique | No definition has been proposed. An eponymous genus for this superfamily does not exist. The taxon is not based on an existing genus and thus is invalid, as noted by Chure and McIntosh (1989:77). |
Definitional History #1 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #2 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #3 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #4 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #5 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #6 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #7 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #8 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #9 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |
Definitional History #10 | |
Earliest Record | |
Latest Record | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) | |
Range (My) |