View Details:  Prev Record    Next Record
Clade
Subclade

Taxon
Taxon
Scelidosaurinae
Nominal Author
Cope 1869
2nd Nominal Author
Nopcsa 1917
Taxon Status INACTIVE
Comments
Potential Synonomy

Active Phylogenetic Definition
Active Definition
Shorthand
Definitional Author
Definition Status Unknown
Definition Type Unknown
Node-Stem Triplet Unknown
Other Triplet Taxa
Specifiers
Specifier(s) A
Specifier(s) B
Specifier(s) C
Qualifiers
+Taxon
-Taxon
Datum
Taxonomic Content
Publication Year Unknown
Unknown
Unknown

Inactive Taxon Status
Rejection Criteria historically polyphyletic
no definition
redundant
Critique
No definition has been proposed. Romer (1956) considered this taxon a monotypic family-level taxon redundant with Scelidosaurus, whereas Steel (1969) includes within this taxon Scelidosaurus, Fabrosaurus, Lusitanosaurus, and Sarcolestes. There is no cladistic support to unite these genera.
 

Definitional History #1
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #2
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #3
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #4
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #5
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #6
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #7
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #8
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #9
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)

Definitional History #10
Earliest Record
Latest Record
Range (My)
Range (My)
Range (My)